best marijuana seeds
Smoking Marijuana Seeds

or time to seem to pass more slowly; it is common for
events to fit more smoothly into this slowed time: "Events and thoughts flow more smoothly; the succession of
events in time is smoother than usual" (12%, 16%, 38%, 20%, 11%). This begins to occur at Moderate levels
(8%, 30%, 31%, 13%, 1%). The Therapy and Growth group has to be more intoxicated to experience this
increased smoothness of flow (p <.05, overall).
The converse common effect, "Events and thoughts follow each other
jerkily; there are sudden changes from one thing to another" (13%, 23%,
35%, 19%,5%) occurs at significantly higher (p <.001) levels of
intoxication (6%, 13%, 34%, 19%, 7%), as illustrated in Figure 9-3.
Meditators experience jerkiness in the flow of time less often than
ordinary users (p <.05) or than the Therapy and Growth group (p <.05).
Users of Psychedelics need to be more intoxicated to experience this
jerkiness (p < .05).
Here-and-Now-ness
(4 of 9)4/15/2004 7:06:17 AM
On Being Stoned - Chapter 9
Figure 9-3. FLOW OF
EVENTS IN TIME
Note.—For guide to interpreting
the
"How Stoned" graph, see note on
Figure 6-1.
Two time phenomena may be alterations in the perception of time per se
or possibly consequences of some of the changes described above.
A
characteristic effect is "I give little or no
trippy stick vaporizer for sale thought to the future; I'm
completely in the here-and-now," and a related very common effect is "I do
things with much less thought to possible consequences of my actions...";
both are dealt with fully in Chapter 15.
Déjà Vu
"While something is happening, I get the funny feeling that this sequence
has happened before, in exactly the same way. Even though I logically
know that it couldn't have happened before, it feels strange, as if it's
repeating exactly (this is called a déjà vu experience and should not be
confused with a false memory)" is a common experience (21%, 23%, 37%,
16%, 3%), which occurs at the middle level of intoxication (4%, 16%,
27%, 20%, 7%). While this is a phenomenon of memory by conservative
standards, it would certainly influence a user's view of the nature of time.
Some users, for example, interpret déjà vu as evidence for reincarnation.
Similarly ostensible precognition (see page 100), while occurring rarely, could also strongly influence a user's
view of the nature of time.
In terms of a human experience, and particularly a marijuana user's experience, the common physical view
of time as an impersonal abstraction flowing along at a constant rate, with only Orange Bud the present being real, is
inadequate, for some people may experience: (I) the past and future as being as real as the present at times; (2)
the rate of time flow changing radically; (3) time stopping (archetypal time); and (4) events fitting smoothly or
jerkily into the flow of time.
Note also that all memory effects (Chapter 14) are relevant to time effects, but they will not be discussed
here.
LEVELS OF INTOXICATION FOR TIME PHENOMENA
Figure 9-4 presen
Cannabisseedspaypal
For Sale
Ivapor
atitudes, low rainfall (were I come from, this one melted to
nothing in early Sept., well before it matured). On top of that, it doesn’t taste to fine either. Also remember
that with auto flowering, you get no chance to filter for sex, so you've got to grow all your seed. Only 25% of
the seed planted will be early flowering female (75% of your plants will either be male or mature to late to be
any good!)"" -retro13"
"“The ones I grew (from Sensi) flowered at 24/0, but only some of the plants did flower. Ended up with one
excellent male and a nice but low-potency female. The male produced a nice buzz even from the leaves.
Made some F2 seeds for further breeding. About 100 days from seed to harvest under a 24/0 light period.”
-Epikur
“This Afghani with its penetrating Indica aroma is one of the better yielders in the collection. Its pleasant
taste and above average potency make this an attractive variety for beginners.” – Sensi Seed Bank catalog"
"""The Shiva Shanti I is a 3 way hybrid which consists mostly of an Afghani strain that we call Garlic Bud because
of its aroma characteristic. The Shiva Shanti II contains a smaller part of this Garlic Bud and is added with
skunk and another Afghani. It is a less stable 4-way hybrid but quality wise very nice. The flowering time will
be somewhere between 45 and 55 days. It is also an F1.""- Alan Dronkers, Sensi Seed Bank"
"""Shiva 2 is a quick, crystally below average yielder. It has a very up quality to the high.""
""Smoked some Cambodian in 67. It was the best we had ever seen at that time. About the size of the later
Thai sticks but it was one bud, the length of a fold lock bag, light gold, $15.00 (we thought the guy was nuts,
$10.00 for 4 fingers at that time] till it kicked our ass. Haven't seen any since."" -Wesos"
"“A 1995 Cannabis Cup winner. This is a very popular sweet plant.3rd place winner 9th Cannabis Cup. A very
potent 50% Indica/50% Sativa cross nicknamed The Killer! Aromatic, sweet tasting producing an incredible
debilitating high. Excellent indoor and hydroponic results. This is a truly militant strain! Expect severe cerebral
damage. Takes no prisoners! Highly recommended. An absolute must! AK-47 as the name implies will blow
you away. Peaceful people that we are, we wanted to convey in a sentence the power of this plant, ""A real one
hit wonder"". AK-47 shot us into 2nd place as a seed company in the 1995 cup, and in '94 it blew away the
judges and took 2nd place in the hydro competition along with 3rd place in the overall Cannabis Cup. The
short flowering time and hard compact buds that ooze glistening trichomes are a delicacy to the proud farmer.
An Indica/Sativa bred with powerful effect and sweet smell in mind."
"""Nevil went to great expense to obtain seeds, a commitment that is best illustrated by a secret trip to
Mazar-i-Sharif in northern Afghanistan. According to the Moslem legend, one of Mohammed's sons died in
Mazar-i-Sharif. Consequently, it is cannabis-sativa
durban poison
tingent event. What society selects as crucial to
perceive about drugs, and what it ignores, tells us a great deal about its cultural fabric.
The scientist makes a distinction between those questions that can be answered
empirically and those wholly in the realm of sentiment. The question of whether
marijuana causes crime is answerable, but the question of whether marijuana is evil or not
is intrinsically unanswerable, within an empirical and scientific framework. It depends
completely on one's perspective. However clear-cut this distinction is in the scientist's
mind, as a tool for understanding the disputants' positions in this controversy, it is
specious and misleading for a variety of reasons.
(3 of 16)4/15/2004 1:03:47 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 3
The strands of value and fact intersect with one another so luxuriantly that in numerous
reasoning sequences they are inseparable. What one society or group or individual takes
for granted as self-evidently harmful, others view as obviously beneficial, even necessary.
In crucial ways, the issue of harm or danger to society as a result of the drug pivots on
moot points, totally unanswerable questions, questions that science is unable to answer
without the resolution of certain basic issues. And for many crucially debated marijuana
questions, this modest requirement cannot be met. In other words, before we raise the
question of whether marijuana has a desirable or a noxious effect, we must first establish
the desirability or the noxiousness to whom. We must concern ourselves with the
differential evaluations of the same objective consequences. Many of the drug's
effects—agreed-upon by friend and foe alike—will be regarded as reprehensible by some
individuals, desirable or neutral by others. Often antimarijuana forces will argue against
the use of the drug, employing reasons which its supporters will also employ—in favor of
its use. We have not a disagreement in what the effects are, but whether they are good or
bad. This is probably the most transparently ideological of all of the platforms of debate
about marijuana. Three illustrations of this orbit of disputation suffice.
Were marijuana use more prevalent than it is today, there would come the billowing of
a distinct aesthetic. The state of marijuana intoxication seems to be associated with, and
even to touch off, a unique and peculiar vision of the world. That the marijuana-induced
vision is distinctive seems to be beyond dispute;5] that it is rewarding or fatuous is a
matter for endless disputation. Inexplicably, the drug seems to engender a mental state
which is coming into vogue in today's art forms. An extraordinarily high proportion of
today's young and avant-garde artists—filmmakers, poets, painters, musicians, novelists,
photographers, mixed-media specialists—use the drug and are influenced by the
marijuana high. Some of the results seem to be the increasing irrelevance of realism; the
loss of i